Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions

Last Tuesday I attended the Inventors Association of Connecticut (IACT) meeting at Fairfield University.  Another patent attorney was presenting on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions.  After Alice, the two-part test on whether a invention is patent eligible is:  1.  is the claim directed to a judicial exception (law of nature, natural phenomenon, or an abstract idea); 2.  if yes, then does the claim recite additional elements that amount more to the judicial exception.

My normal practice is to write claims that are clearly not an abstract idea (claims directed to a law of nature or natural phenomenon are so rare in my practice that I have never written one).  However, patent attorney John Yankovitch says that when he must write claims that are directed to an abstract idea then he does part 2 of the test and adds significantly “more” to the claims.  In that endeavor examples of significantly more are:

1.  improvement to another technology or technical field, e.g. a mathematic formula applied in a specific rubber molding process;

2.  improvements to the functioning of the computer itself;

3.  applying the judicial exception with, or by use of a particular machine;

4.  transformation or reduction of a particular article to a different state or thing, e.g. manufacturing fat acids and glycerine from fatty bodies by the action of water at a high temperature and pressure; and

5. performing an unconventional step.

Mr. Yankovitch stated that examples 1, 2, and 5 seem to have the most success at the USPTO.

These are good rules of thumb!

The USPTO is hosting a Webinar on Application Data Sheets on April 19, 2018

Topic: “Understanding the Application Data Sheet (ADS).”

The USPTO’s Inventor Info Chat webinar series continues on April 19, 2018 from 11 a.m. – noon ET with an informative discussion on understanding the Application Data Sheet (ADS).

The topics covered will include:  Explanation of the ADS, what it is, revisions, and who reviews it; Explanation of each section of the ADS; Time frame for submission of the ADS; Corrections to the ADS.

In addition, the common mistakes made by applicants when completing the Application Data Sheet will be discussed along with the steps and format necessary to make the corrections. This presentation will be as helpful resource to those inventors who have received correspondence from the PTO requiring corrections to the Application Data Sheet.

Sign up and additional information can be found here.

The Law Offices of Michael A. Blake celebrates 14 years!

On April 1, 2004 I began my patent and trademark practice, the Law Offices of Michael A. Blake in West Hartford, CT.  Luck, hard work, and a higher power has made my business a success in helping people obtain patent and trademark protection for their intellectual property.  I moved my practice to Milford at the end of 2004, and have been here ever since.  Looking forward to the next 14 and more years!

Free training at the U.S. Patent Office in May and August

Stakeholder Training on Examination Practice and Procedure (STEPP) is training designed to provide external stakeholders with a better understanding of how and why an examiner makes decisions while examining a patent application. In person courses are led by USPTO trainers and based on material developed for training employees of the USPTO.

Upcoming training:

Agent/Attorney 3-Day Course,  May 22-24, 2018 location: Alexandria, VA – USPTO Headquarters

Inventor 3-Day Course August 14-16, 2018, location: Alexandria, VA – USPTO Headquarters

Program Description

The STEPP program provides unique, day-in-the-life, experiences to those attending training. Material used within the program is derived from training delivered to patent examiners and other USPTO employees.

What does STEPP Cover?

The same examination practice and procedure training provided to USPTO staff is now available to external stakeholders. Learn what an examiner must consider in preparing an office action, and what examiners are taught to interpret an applicant’s disclosure.

Why Participate?

STEPP provides perspective by detailing what an examiner considers in preparing an office action. Training focuses on how an examiner is taught to use the MPEP to make patentability determinations and write an office action. Gaining perspective of an examiner’s point of view will increase your situational awareness which can aid in compact prosecution. Payment and Credit STEPP courses are free of charge. The USPTO will apply for CLE accreditation for specific courses within the program. Please contact [email protected] for additional information.

More information can be found here.

Celebrating the 10th anniversary of the UCONN LAW IP CLINIC

Yesterday, I was happy to celebrate with the UConn School of Law’s Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship Law Clinic.  They had a luncheon to observe their 10 year anniversary in Hartford.  It was nice seeing old friends and co-workers, and especially some of the inventors the IP CLINIC has served over the years.  I was proud to be part of the IP CLINIC for 2 years.  More information can be seen here.

 

REMINDER: Patent Attorney Michael Blake Presenting at Inventors Meeting in Fairfield on March 27

Just a quick reminder!  On March 27, 2018, 7 pm, at Fairfield University Library room 101, I will be presenting at the Inventors Association of Connecticut meeting.  The topic will be Pros and Cons of Provisional Patent Applications.  The differences between a provisional patent application and a non-provisional patent application will be presented. Benefits and disadvantages of the provisional application will be discussed. Other intellectual property may also be discussed such as design patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets.  More information can be found here.

USPTO presents Inventor Info Chat-Webinar: Common Mistakes and Support after Filing

The USPTO’s Inventor Info Chat webinar series continues on March 15, 2018 from 11am – noon ET when they provide a presentation on common mistakes and support after filing.

Presentation overview

  • Understand the requirements when filing a Utility Application
  • Overview of common mistakes found at time of filing and how to avoid them
  • Understanding the proper format of the specification and drawings and proper method to make corrections, when necessary
  • Proper completion of forms, including the Application Data Sheet and Micro Entity forms
  • Methods to access customer support services after filing an application

This session will discuss the common mistakes and will include explanations and examples of the proper format for making corrections. This presentation will assist in the understanding of the basic filing requirements and will be a helpful resource to those inventors who have received correspondence from the PTO requiring corrections to parts of the application.  Sign up information can be found here.

Patent Quality Chat – Webinar today at noon

Topic:  Subject Matter Eligibility:  Guidance & Examination Resources”.

The USPTO’s Patent Quality Chat webinar continues its 2018 series in March with “Subject Matter Eligibility:  Guidance & Examination Resources”.

USPTO’s Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, Bob Bahr, will be discussing available resources issued by the Office on subject matter eligibility, with an emphasis on the latest revision of the MPEP from January.  The USPTO looks forward to hearing your feedback about the resources presented and your ideas for new ways USPTO can assist in your considerations of subject matter eligibility.  Please send your input and questions to [email protected] (link sends e-mail) before and during the event.

This webinar is of interest to all those prosecuting patent applications and/or with interest in statutory compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 101.

No registration is necessary to attend.  The Patent Quality Chat webinar series is presented as a part of USPTO’s continuous efforts to improve patent quality.  Sign up info here